Are divine spokespersons responsible for mistaken words that mislead believers?

Yes. In my understanding, harmful words involve karmic consequences. Religious workers need particular caution. Representing a deity does not remove concern for what is said.

I used encouraging someone to do wrong as a comparison: effects do not require personally performing the act. Words can lead others wrongly. We must not mislead students and remain responsible for speech and action.

People wishing to be mediums need to listen, observe and learn, developing knowledge and understanding. They should clearly understand the worshipped deity’s origin, vows, virtue and ways of helping.

Some may not yet understand what happens even themselves. That makes continued learning more important, not less. Taking this responsibility requires ongoing growth and awareness of words and acts.

Responsibility extends beyond religion. Government manages public matters, and I also mentioned police. Positions affecting many can cause broad harm when poorly fulfilled. From practice, knowingly neglecting duties increases responsibility. This is a reminder about duty and karma, not guilt determined by job title.

Media sharing carries the same responsibility. I know programs seek interest and effect. But divination and spiritual teachers telling false stories or exaggerating help may distort listeners’ understanding of faith. Greater recognition calls for greater respect for trust, beyond entertainment.

Even claimed divine words require understanding their meaning and reminder. Some transmitted books may be profound and reasonable, others not. A named source does not warrant wholesale acceptance. Especially when tired, angry or overly familiar with a friend, personal thoughts may enter answers. Concern for speech’s karma makes me share what I understand and explore what remains unclear.